There are only two events known to cause ground-hugging pyroclastic flows (pictured above).
-
A volcanic eruption
-
A thermo nuclear detonation
by “Dennis”
All research provided by:
www.drjudywood.com and http://911u.org/
On the morning of September 11th, 2001, we were told a fairy tale. That wide body jets flew into the twin towers and completely destroyed them. Let me repeat that: Passenger planes (large hollow aluminum tubes) flew into industrial steel, marble and concrete sky scrapers, and caused them to turn into a pile of dust. And the worst part about this fairy tale is that we, the American people believed it. Now, nine years later, it’s time to wake up from your slumber and take a good hard look at what did and did not happen on that fateful day. The conventional explanation we were provided, by government and media, for a top-down highly destructive gravitational collapse, in near-free-fall times, is physically impossible, and is thus about as worthy of discussion as is the belief that the Earth is flat.
FICTION: Passenger jets flew into the Twin Towers, and the burning jet fuel caused them to collapse.
FACT: The Twin Towers did not collapse. They suffered a mid-air pulverization due to an extreme unconventional energy source that caused the initial upward trajectory of so much of the towers’ mass during the ‘collapses’ as (supposedly only) gravity was pulling them down.
FICTION: The burning jet fuel melted all of the steel beams causing the buildings to collapse directly onto their own footprint.
FACT: 80% of each of the towers 50 million ton mass NEVER hit the ground. The steel did not melt, but turned into nano-dust. Pulverization + Molecular Dissociation = Ground ZeroEvidence. When matter is elevated to temperatures hotter than the surface of the Sun,molecular dissociation results. Molecular Dissociation (MD) is easy to understand once we realize that there are four (4) states of matter: solid, liquid, gas, and plasma. Just as ice has trouble surviving in water or steam, molecules have trouble surviving in plasma, which is highly energetic (ie, extremely hot). When molecules dissociate, they leave behind loose atoms and fragments of molecules. In other words, extremely small particles. In this sense, it is correct to think of molecular dissociation as disintegration.
What do these two pictures have in common? They both represent a highly unconventional destructive release of energy, with temperatures much hotter than the sun.
So once we confirm evidence of widespread molecular dissociation having occurred at Ground Zero in New York City, we have a very strong indication that only exotic, unconventional weaponry could have released that much extremely — unimaginably — high intensity energy which suddenly appeared just as the towers disintegrated from top to bottom. This understanding means we cannot blame the highly unconventional Ground Zero devastation on thermite/thermate/super thermate and “controlled demolition” any more than we can blame it on “jet fuel” or “box cutters”.
In a “pancake collapse” the rubble pile should be at least 1/8 of the original building height (12.5%). The actual rubble pile was no more than 2% of the original building height. Both towers went “poof.”
So where did these 110 story tall 50 million ton sky scrapers go?
They were turned into nano-dust and 80% of the “dust” floated off into the atmosphere.
From left to right: A huge steel beam from the south tower falters, turns to “dust” and blows away.
Now that we’ve scientifically proven that only exotic, unconventional weaponry could have released that much extremely — unimaginably — high intensity energy to cause the pulverization and molecular dissociation of these buildings, let’s look at some of the other unexplainable anomalies..
1400 VEHICLES melted NEAR WTC
All of these cars have unexplainable similar damage: Paint gone, instant rusting, and all of their door handles and engine blocks are missing!
A squad car on FDR drive with wilted doors, burned paint, instant rust and no door handles or engine block.
Strange fires appear to be attracted to the engine blocks, while the gas tanks and nearby paper are not affected.
Buildings a few blocks away,had mysterious holes in the windows, and the front marble façade is completely gone, but no other damage.
Why doesn’t the paper burn?
For months we witnessed trucks coming and going from Ground Zero and the media told us they were hauling away the steel. What steel? There was very little steel left in the rubble because it had been pulverized into nano-dust. So what were these trucks really hauling back and forth? Dirt! They hauled in dirt, spread it all over Ground Zero, then scooped it up and hauled it away, and this went on for years. Didn’t they do that at Chernobyl? Yes they did!
So now you know what didn’t cause the buildings to “vanish.” Planes, jet fuel and thermite are irrelevant. So what kind of unconventional energy could have caused the Twin Towers to turn to dust? A fissionless fusion thermo nuclear event? Direct Energy Weapons? HAARP? A scaled up weaponized version of The Hutchison Effect? The investigation continues………

{ 11 comments… read them below or add one }
From day 1…… i said and knew and believed!!!!!! Terrible things are on the way….
It is too bad the author of this article is burying the truth.
It is too bad that the author of this article does not want you to know the truth.
Modern day normal explosives won`t make steel dissentigrate!? I believe that a certain amount of explosives were used and couls have been installed when the structure was built and non-els and mili-second non-els could have been connected to the main lines and prills + deisel + concrete could have been structurally implanted as the main diversion of a sample of the latest nuclear/atomic/protomic government development bye Bush`s military mad scientists!?
>>The buildings were steel structured and it is said the steel was pulverized to dust! I can understand why! As a diversion from could have been the truth of a very futuristic energy development of what may be close to an explanation of maybe a metal lazar heat treatment at a phenominal magnification,the conductivity of that metal infrastructure of being not as reinforced in the middle of those buildings and proper detonation of explosives could have aided/covered up the truth of that futuristic energy of destruction maxi-Hollywood showmanship!?
>>I feel they were nuked as a real nuke can happen and I don`t mean common explosives after examining some videos that I haven`t seen since 2001!?
>>Obama;Where were you when this all took place in politics? The whole Bush administration was let off the hook and no wonder;Bush was given the reigning power bye government so what could they do? Only such as what is happenning in Egypt today could do anything against government officials!? Are they off the hook? Sure hope not!?
Fact/truth or fiction? YOU decide!?
Yes, 9/11 was definitely a high-tech ‘magic’ show. And among known technologies, only a string of clean micro nukes could have caused the observed annihilation/disintegration (not pulverization, not vaporization) of the towers to nanoparticles, and those impressive pyroclastic debris flows. Worrying too much about why paper did not burn is an excellent distraction, which may be why disinformer Judy Wood tries to make so much of it — what better way to make 9/11 seem like an unsolvable enigma (which helps keep the perps at large) involving sci-fi ultra-weaponry (which makes the perps seem all-powerful) than to focus on its minor but puzzling mysteries and use that as the basis for a far-out “theory”? It is far more important to simply reject the hateful ludicrous impossible official government theory of what happened on 9/11.
Dr Time,
It seems somewhat counter-productive to look to Obama for having let Bush off the hook. Focusing on individuals can be highly distractive, and often misses (or obscures!) a much bigger point: Pulled punches are the surest sign of fake opposition. Dems-vs-Reps is no more genuine than is professional wrestling. They are 2 heads of the same Constitution-eating monster, and have been for generations! It is pretty blatant, too. (What does it tell you that no so-called professor of political ‘science’ is able to notice this? How, in a Constitutional republic, can impeachment, which is part of the Constitution, ever be “off the table”??) http://fawcett911.us/audio/NatcyPelosi-ImpeachmentIsOffTheTable.mp3
Dimitri Khalezov – WTC Nuclear Demolition [1/26]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAV_BUQoGBw
Dimitri Khalezov has been an expert in nuclear demolition for many years and has an incredible amount of proof that the buildings were taken down by underground micro nuclear demolition charges! I’ve posted some links to other material such as the melted cars that could have only been done by EMP type effects caused by a nuclear bomb since there was no jet fuel burning at ground level AND some of these cars were missing engine blocks! They were totally melted! How do you melt an engine block when no fire was burning at ground level – many of these cars were 7 blocks away! They were never explained in any way. Also it was never explained why Tritium levels were 55 times more than normal at ground zero. And of course we have ALL the strange cancers from first responders and many of them have died. They were forced to wear “air quality” badges which Dimitri says were really just radiation detectors in disguise so they could monitor everybody’s exposure and pull people out of the hot zones for a while when their badges reported higher radiation. Easy to lie to everybody and tell them the badge is to monitor air quality. That is pure garbage if you think about it. There is not going to be that much difference in “air quality around such a relatively small area anyway.
Dimitri even said that in the 70′s he was told that the Americans had authorized the twin towers to be taken down at the end of their lifetimes with small nuclear demolition charges! I did some research and it was true! It was determined that only a nuclear demolition charge could safely bring down both Towers and Building 7 because of their construction. Here’s some good information on nuclear demolition
Of all places to find out the truth why the towers were demolishioned(Forensic psychiatry?) I sort of knew how,I just didn`t know why! It made common sence when I was told! So that the other close structures wouldn`t be damaged when they came down!
It does appear to be a planned event to prove a point to some one or many!
Some one looked into the future to know what/how to do such a suicide murder event! Some one/many are definitely guilty of murder!
It was a multi-milisecond detonation from close to the bottom to the bottom and to the top at the same time!
I have a few years of experience with explosives myself but never tried building demolishion that I know of unless it was in a past/future life!
The planes did not bring the buildings down and I don`t know enough about nuclear explosions but I don`t think this one was! Primer cord wrapped around the steel,quite possibly though? Just a guess about the melting steel?
i am really amazed, still i am confused…so wat r we sayn ,our own goverment did this…i find that to be a little concerning…but u do have some solid facts… i need more info
A mini/full nuke should have been a lmost instantanious then the building come crashing down and a nuke would have only exploded the bottom outward and upwards only a bit!? Explosives blow out to the weakest spots!?
Was much debris blown outward or was it contained almost inward as a demolition expert would have done to create the least amount of damage to other structures as possible? A NUKE would have blown the bottom of the beginning or the top as is mediaized to kingdom come!? Out ward and not inward-Wouldn`t it? A fuel explosion would definitely have blown outward and not inward!?
The general public is so gullible and so hynotized as well-It so does seem-Doesn`t it?
The reason 9/11 happened is in part, to hide the theft of 2.6 Trillion dollars that could not be accounted for. On 9/10 Donald Rumsfeld announced that the Pentagon could not account for 2.6 trillion dollars missing from the Pentagon budget.
When the Pentagon was hit by a missle, the target was one huge mainframe computer which happens to be the computer that had all the information about the 2.6 Tillion dollars within it.
As for the Twin Towers, they both were filled with explosives from top to bottom.
Wonder what it would cost to build two underground tunnels from the USA to Africa and India and steal their oil/gas and refill their own cavities(caves) that they emptied over the years and now have as global stock?
Just an assumption!?
Grrr!?
Was Obama involved and a member of that administration at the time of such an assumption?
Mr.Nice Guy in the black market?
Could he get his country out of debt bye selling their oil/gas and make it look like his government did right for the people?
A complicated twisted web of destruction and greed and stupidity?
Wonder if maybe that liquid tranfer made its way north unbeknown to the supposeds to their vacancies and now the north owns it and the companies as well? They probably will give back to the rightful owners,but then what?
Those few trillion could then become minor to what it turned into if at that time those involved had have come clean!?
Kind of glad i am not that involved in that conspiracy and want it cleaned up as well!?
Ever try to con a real street con with a master`s?
So sad for so many innocents!?
You must log in to post a comment.