I guess the point is, it’s better to be a Jewess that engages in degenerate and sick acts, and calls them art, by artificially inseminating herself over and over again, over nine months, and then aborts the fetuses that resulted over and over than to be a White male or a racist. That’s the message I get out of this publicity stunt anyway. It’s interesting that a Yale student can do this and the faculty and administration say nothing, but oh my God, let a Yale student pass out a few flyers calling attention to the fact that the entire media apparatus is in the hands of ethnic Jews, and they’d calling for an inquisition.
If you’d like to contact the student Aliza Shvarts, here’s her email address. Why don’t you ask her who she thinks is worse, a racially conscious White person or a murdering Jewess. aliza.shvarts@yale.edu
Art major Aliza Shvarts ‘08 wants to make a statement.
Beginning next Tuesday, Shvarts will be displaying her senior art project, a documentation of a nine-month process during which she artificially inseminated herself “as often as possible” while periodically taking abortifacient drugs to induce miscarriages. Her exhibition will feature video recordings of these forced miscarriages as well as preserved collections of the blood from the process.
The goal in creating the art exhibition, Shvarts said, was to spark conversation and debate on the relationship between art and the human body. But her project has already provoked more than just debate, inciting, for instance, outcry at a forum for fellow senior art majors held last week. And when told about Shvarts’ project, students on both ends of the abortion debate have expressed shock — saying the project does everything from violate moral code to trivialize abortion.
But Shvarts insists her concept was not designed for “shock value.” [Sure]
“I hope it inspires some sort of discourse,” Shvarts said. “Sure, some people will be upset with the message and will not agree with it, but it’s not the intention of the piece to scandalize anyone.” ["Some people" implies not very many, implying it isn't that big of a deal]
The “fabricators,” or donors, of the sperm were not paid for their services, but Shvarts required them to periodically take tests for sexually transmitted diseases. She said she was not concerned about any medical effects the forced miscarriages may have had on her body. The abortifacient drugs she took were legal and herbal, she said, and she did not feel the need to consult a doctor about her repeated miscarriages.
Shvarts declined to specify the number of sperm donors she used, as well as the number of times she inseminated herself.
Art major Juan Castillo ‘08 said that although he was intrigued by the
creativity and beauty of her senior project, not everyone was as thrilled as he was by the concept and the means by which she attained the result. [Murder is apparently "creative" and "beautiful." Imagine that?]
“I really loved the idea of this project, but a lot other people didn?t,” Castillo said. “I think that most people were very resistant to thinking about what the project was really about. [The senior-art-project forum] stopped being a conversation on the work itself.”
Related articles: